Attendance Tracking Using Solar Bluetooth Beacon Badges

Recent research outlines the design and deployment of an attendance tracking system using battery-free photovoltaic Bluetooth beacon badges. These badges, powered by indoor light, transmit Bluetooth packets to stationary gateways for collection and upload to a cloud-based platform for real-time visualisation. The system addresses issues of environmental sustainability and maintenance by replacing traditional chemical batteries with light-harvesting technology, enabling operation even in low-light conditions (as low as 17 Lux).

The badges are compact, cost-effective (under $1 each), and incorporate a photovoltaic panel and an energy management circuit. This setup ensures that the devices accumulate and store energy efficiently before broadcasting signals via Bluetooth. Gateways equipped with Bluetooth and WiFi capabilities capture these signals and relay attendance data to a cloud service for analysis. The system’s applications include academic conferences and similar events requiring crowd tracking without privacy concerns associated with cameras or WiFi-based methods.

Field tests during a conference in Auckland validated the system’s functionality, demonstrating effective attendance monitoring in multiple rooms. This innovative approach reflects a move towards environmentally friendly and low-maintenance solutions in the growing field of ambient IoT.

Does Bluetooth LE Work the Same Way in all Countries?

Bluetooth technology operates on a global scale using the 2.4 GHz ISM band, allowing devices to be used internationally without specific adaptations for local radio spectrum regulations. The Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG) ensures that all devices meet international standards for compatibility and interoperability.

However, there are certain regulatory considerations that vary by country. Some nations require Bluetooth devices to undergo type approval, for example CE (for Europe) or FCC (for USA), to ensure they adhere to local standards. Additionally, power output limitations for Bluetooth devices can differ from one country to another. For example, Australia permits a maximum of 200 mW e.i.r.p. within a specific frequency range, while most European countries adhere to standard ISM band regulations.

Do Bluetooth Beacons Need a Licence to Use?

Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) technology does not require a licence for use, making it a popular choice for various devices including smartwatches, fitness trackers, laptops, PCs, smartphones and industrial equipment.

BLE operates in the 2.4 GHz ISM (Industrial Scientific Medical) band, which is licence-free in most countries. This means that anyone can use this frequency range without obtaining a specific permit which has contributed to the widespread adoption of BLE technology. BLE is an open standard managed by the Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG), which allows for broad implementation across various devices.

Raspberry Pi Pico 2 W

The Raspberry Pi Pico 2 W has been released, bringing WiFi and Bluetooth to the popular microcontroller platform at an incredibly affordable price of just $7 (£4.80). This new iteration builds upon the success of its predecessor, offering improved performance and connectivity options that make it ideal for a wide range of IoT and Bluetooth projects.

The integration of Wi-Fi (2.4GHz 802.11n) and Bluetooth 5.2 provides wireless connectivity, making the Pico 2 W an excellent choice for a variety of solutions. The most exciting advancement in the Pico 2 W for us is the addition of Bluetooth 5.2 making the board ideal for Bluetooth LE applications, such as beacon detection or transmitting iBeacon or Eddystone. The Pico 2 W can be used in indoor positioning systems for precise navigation and tracking in large spaces, proximity-based marketing to deliver personalised promotions in retail environments and asset tracking for real-time inventory management.

Beacons Without Batteries

The batteries in the beacons we sell can last from months up to 7+ years depending on the beacon, battery size and type.

While the latest power efficient SoC beacons can make more of the available battery power you might want to consider not using batteries at all so as to ease maintenance.

USB-powered beacons can operate from any USB socket, allowing them to be connected to devices like desktops or used with affordable plug-in mains USB power supplies costing just a few pounds, dollars, or euros. However, placing the antenna in close proximity to the desktop or power supply can limit the range and block the spread of the Bluetooth radio signal. To address this issue, some USB beacons are designed with external dipole antennas.

The Bluetooth (Class 1) standard has a maximum output power of 20dBm. (Read our article for explanation of power). Many beacons don’t use this maximum as it would quickly flatten the battery. Most only allow up to +4dBm, +6dBm or +8dBm. In most cases battery beacons are set to operate at 0dBm. An advantage of USB powered beacons is that they can emit more power than is practical with a battery. For example, the the FSC-BP109 up to 4000m.

USB Beacons

Understanding UPS Delivery

We send beacons using UPS for our courier service. When we book a shipment, you will receive a notification email from UPS. However, it’s important to note that this email does not confirm the package has been collected.

The actual pickup of your shipment depends on whether UPS has already completed our collection for the day. If they have, the pickup will take place on the next working day (Monday to Friday). Unfortunately, the pickup time is not fixed and can vary, so we are unable to provide a specific cut of time for next day delivery. To increase the likelihood of same-day dispatch, it’s best to place your order as early in the day as possible.

Additionally, if the initial email from UPS includes a delivery date, we recommend ignoring it. This date is frequently inaccurate and should not be relied upon as a guarantee of when your package will arrive.

For most shipments within the UK, excluding those destined for very remote areas, UPS typically delivers the day after pickup.

BeaconZone Ideas Gallery

BeaconZone was set up in 2015 with the aim of encouraging companies and organisations to explore beyond the confines of retail marketing solutions into areas such as the Physical Web, asset control, security, sensing and the Internet of Things (IoT).

View the Ideas Gallery where you can gain inspiration based on actual BeaconZone customer scenarios.

Tackling Bluetooth AoA Complexity for Real-World Applications

We’ve had several customers express interest in developing their own Angle of Arrival (AoA) software, often starting with basic AoA scripts provided by evaluation boards. Unfortunately, these evaluation scripts are usually insufficient for production-level implementations due to a number of critical limitations.

Evaluation board scripts typically apply basic signal processing techniques that struggle with real-world challenges, especially in areas like noise reduction and calibration. Multipath, that’s signals reflecting and arriving in multiple directions, mitigation is often inadequate, making these scripts less effective in complex environments. Simple scripts usually employ straightforward phase interferometry methods that are limited in their ability to handle multipath scenarios. Additionally, they tend to use outdated AoA IQ-to-Angle algorithms, which further affects performance.

Production systems must be capable of managing multiple tags and anchors simultaneously, in real time. Evaluation scripts, however, are generally designed for a single tag and anchor, lacking the logic necessary for multi-device scenarios. They also don’t include advanced features like parallel processing, trilateration or data fusion across multiple anchors, which are essential for achieving 3D positioning.

Evaluation scripts are also designed for controlled conditions, with minimal error checking. They typically lack robust error detection and correction mechanisms essential for reliability in dynamic environments. Furthermore, these scripts do not incorporate fallback mechanisms, such as temporarily lowering accuracy in the presence of short-term radio frequency noise.

A production-ready system also requires integration with broader ecosystems, such as APIs or interfaces for asset management systems or databases, enabling seamless data flow and operational integration.

Key Areas to Address for Production-Ready AoA Systems:

  1. Advanced Signal Processing: Noise reduction is essential for ensuring accuracy in challenging environments.
  2. Multipath Resolution Algorithms: Needed to distinguish direct signals from reflections, enhancing positional accuracy.
  3. Multi-Device Management: Simultaneously support multiple tags and anchors to enable scalability in deployment.
  4. Data Fusion and Trilateration: Combine data from multiple anchors to calculate precise 3D positioning.
  5. Robust Error Handling: Implement comprehensive error detection, logging, correction and fallback mechanisms for consistent reliability.
  6. Performance Optimisation: Achieve real-time processing by optimising code and utilising hardware acceleration.
  7. System Integration: Enable compatibility with enterprise systems by providing appropriate interfaces and data formats.

By addressing these areas, a production-ready AoA system can achieve the reliability, accuracy, and scalability required for effective deployment in complex, real-world environments.

Read about PrecisonRTLS

Beacon Rollout: Best Practices for Minimising Erroneous Data Collection

Beacon rollout, especially on a large scale, offers both technical and logistical challenges that can be difficult to foresee. One of the primary obstacles lies in ensuring that the test data collected is accurate, reliable, and not impacted by the beacons in transit that haven’t yet been installed. Allied to this, security concerns with certain beacons arise due to the ease of manually switching some models on and off, which can lead to potential tampering after deployment.

When dealing with numerous beacons in a rollout, one of the foremost issues encountered is the collection of erroneous data from beacons that haven’t been installed yet. As these uninstalled beacons are often carried around during deployment, they can inadvertently be picked up by the network, which results in inaccurate data being associated with incorrect locations. This misleading data can create confusion and additional workload, as it requires careful analysis to separate genuine location data from the erroneous data generated by beacons that are simply in transit.

Some beacon models come with manual switches that are intended to make them easier to manage. While this can be convenient for setup, these accessible switches can also pose a security risk. If someone with malicious intent gains access to the beacons, they may tamper with them, switching them off to disrupt communication or even switching them on in the wrong location. This can undermine the reliability of the data collected and even create security vulnerabilities in the beacon network.

One effective solution we discovered through trial and error is the use beacons without manual switches and large Faraday bags to manage uninstalled beacons. Faraday bags block electromagnetic signals and prevent the beacons from inadvertently transmitting data before they’re installed. By placing beacons inside these bags, we avoid unnecessary data collection and maintain greater control over when and where each beacon starts transmitting.

Privacy vs. Performance: The Challenges Facing Google’s Find My Device Network

Recently, we mentioned Google’s new Find My Device network and how well-known brands like Chipolo and Pebblebee have introduced compatible tracking beacons, with more brands expected to join soon.

However, Google’s Find My Device network has been facing notable criticism for prioritising privacy to the extent that it undermines the platform’s core purpose of effectively locating missing devices. Unlike Apple’s Find My network, which operates on an opt-out model and builds a robust tracking network from the vast majority of users, Google’s Find My Device requires users to actively opt in to share location data. This opt-in system, while reinforcing privacy, has limited network participation and compromised the network’s coverage, especially in areas with fewer users.

Some industry observers argue that Google’s commitment to privacy is unconvincing, given the company’s longstanding practices of data collection across various platforms. The irony of Google promoting user privacy while having a track record of data usage hasn’t escaped the attention of critics, who find the company’s claim to privacy-first design less persuasive in practice. Moreover, users are often left unclear on how to enable full functionality on their devices.